Who is better, Larson or Kim?
Jordan Larson leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Kim Yeon-koung — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jordan Larson above Kim Yeon-koung: 79.4 vs 79.3. Jordan Larson leads on Honours. Kim Yeon-koung leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Larson wins: Honours
Kim wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jordan-larson-vs-kim-yeon-koung
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Larson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Larson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 33 |
| 🇰🇷 Kim | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LarsonActive | KimActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 4 | — |
| MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Champions League titles | 2 | 1 |
| Olympic MVP | — | 1 |
| Asian Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Korean league MVP awards | — | 7 |
| Olympic top scorer | — | 2 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Jordan Larson leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.3 for Kim Yeon-koung — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kim scores higher on peak, statistics. Larson leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Larson: 79.4, Kim: 79.3.
Make your case for Larson vs Kim. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.