Who is better, Jordan or Lilly?
Michael Jordan leads with a cross-sport score of 93.4 against 92.0 for Kristine Lilly — a gap of 1.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Jordan above Kristine Lilly: 93.4 vs 92.0. Michael Jordan leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Kristine Lilly leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jordan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Lilly wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jordan-vs-kristine-lilly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
95.3 in-sport × 0.98 Global participation & competition depth
Jordan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Lilly — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JordanRetired · Washington Wizards | LillyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 98 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 94 |
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| Finals MVP | 6 | — |
| Regular season MVP | 5 | — |
| Scoring titles | 10 | — |
| Points per game | 30.1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 14 | — |
| USA caps | — | 354 |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| USA goals | — | 130 |
| World Cups contested | — | 5 |
Michael Jordan leads with a cross-sport score of 93.4 against 92.0 for Kristine Lilly — a gap of 1.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lilly scores higher on longevity. Jordan leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Each in-sport GOAT score is multiplied by Competition Depth: Jordan 0.98 (basketball) and Lilly 1.00 (football). Deeper, more global sports keep more of their score.
Make your case for Jordan vs Lilly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.