Who is better, Jordan or Avdija?
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 17.9 for Deni Avdija — a gap of 77.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Jordan above Deni Avdija: 95.3 vs 17.9. Michael Jordan leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jordan wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Avdija wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jordan-vs-ros-deni-avdija
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jordan leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Avdija — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Avdija — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JordanRetired · Washington Wizards | AvdijaActive · Portland Trail Blazers |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| Finals MVP | 6 | — |
| Regular season MVP | 5 | — |
| Scoring titles | 10 | — |
| Points per game | 30.1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 14 | — |
| NBA games | — | 425 |
| NBA points | — | 5,644 |
| Number | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 18 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 22.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 16 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 14 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 19.3 |
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 17.9 for Deni Avdija — a gap of 77.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Avdija does not lead any of the five categories; Jordan is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jordan: 95.3, Avdija: 17.9.
Make your case for Jordan vs Avdija. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.