Who is better, Jordan or Edwards?
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 90.8 for Teresa Edwards — a gap of 4.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Jordan above Teresa Edwards: 95.3 vs 90.8. Michael Jordan leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Teresa Edwards leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jordan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Edwards wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jordan-vs-teresa-edwards
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jordan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Edwards — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JordanRetired · Washington Wizards | EdwardsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| Finals MVP | 6 | — |
| Regular season MVP | 5 | — |
| Scoring titles | 10 | — |
| Points per game | 30.1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 14 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 4 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 5 |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic assists record | — | 143 |
| Seasons played | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 88 |
Michael Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 95.3 against 90.8 for Teresa Edwards — a gap of 4.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edwards scores higher on longevity. Jordan leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jordan: 95.3, Edwards: 90.8.
Make your case for Jordan vs Edwards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.