Who is better, Masopust or Carmona?
Olga Carmona leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Josef Masopust — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Olga Carmona above Josef Masopust: 84.8 vs 84.7. Olga Carmona leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Josef Masopust leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carmona wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Masopust wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/josef-masopust-vs-olga-carmona-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carmona leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Masopust | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 268 | 561 |
| 🇪🇸 Carmona | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 355 | 728 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MasopustRetired | CarmonaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Ballon d'Or awards | 1 | — |
| World Cup finals | 1 | — |
| Czechoslovak league titles | 8 | — |
| Czechoslovakia caps | 63 | — |
| Seasons played | 25 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| World Cup final goals | — | 1 |
| Nations League titles | — | 1 |
| Spain caps | — | 50 |
| Liga F appearances | — | 150 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Olga Carmona leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Josef Masopust — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Masopust scores higher on longevity. Carmona leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Masopust: 84.7, Carmona: 84.8.
Make your case for Masopust vs Carmona. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.