Who is better, Brakočević or Steffes?
Kent Steffes leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.4 for Jovana Brakočević — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kent Steffes above Jovana Brakočević: 84.7 vs 84.4. Kent Steffes leads on Dominance, Peak. Jovana Brakočević leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Steffes wins: Dominance, Peak
Brakočević wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jovana-brakocevic-vs-kent-steffes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Steffes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Brakočević | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 42 |
| 🇺🇸 Steffes | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 287 | 753 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrakočevićRetired | SteffesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Champions League medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| AVP tour wins | — | 100 |
| AVP MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Tour season titles | — | 4 |
| Years at the top level | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Kent Steffes leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.4 for Jovana Brakočević — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brakočević scores higher on statistics, longevity. Steffes leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brakočević: 84.4, Steffes: 84.7.
Make your case for Brakočević vs Steffes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.