Who is better, Joyner-Kersee or Ndiema?
Jackie Joyner-Kersee leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 24.1 for Josia Ndiema — a gap of 68.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jackie Joyner-Kersee above Josia Ndiema: 92.1 vs 24.1. Jackie Joyner-Kersee leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Joyner-Kersee wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Ndiema wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/joyner-kersee-vs-nl-josia-ndiema
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Joyner-Kersee leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Ndiema — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Joyner-Kersee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35,027 |
| 🌍 Ndiema | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Joyner-KerseeRetired | NdiemaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 6 | — |
| World Championship golds | 4 | — |
| Heptathlon world record | 7,291 | — |
| Long jump best (m) | 7.49 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 24 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 26 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 22 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 25 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 23 |
Jackie Joyner-Kersee leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 24.1 for Josia Ndiema — a gap of 68.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ndiema does not lead any of the five categories; Joyner-Kersee is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Joyner-Kersee: 92.1, Ndiema: 24.1.
Make your case for Joyner-Kersee vs Ndiema. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.