Who is better, Márquez or Hagler?
Juan Manuel Márquez leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Marvelous Marvin Hagler — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Juan Manuel Márquez and Marvelous Marvin Hagler level at 85.4. Juan Manuel Márquez leads on Longevity. Marvelous Marvin Hagler leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Márquez wins: Longevity
Hagler wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/juan-manuel-marquez-vs-marvin-hagler
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Márquez leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Márquez | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 25 |
| 🇺🇸 Hagler | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 41 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MárquezRetired | HaglerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles in weight classes | 4 | — |
| Professional wins | 56 | — |
| Knockouts | 40 | 52 |
| World title fights | 25 | — |
| Career losses | 7 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Title defences | — | 12 |
| Career wins | — | 62 |
| Undisputed reigns | — | 1 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Juan Manuel Márquez leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Marvelous Marvin Hagler — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hagler scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Márquez leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Márquez: 85.4, Hagler: 85.4.
Make your case for Márquez vs Hagler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.