Who is better, Del Potro or Wilander?
Juan Martín del Potro leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Mats Wilander — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Juan Martín del Potro and Mats Wilander level at 82.4. Juan Martín del Potro leads on Peak, Statistics. Mats Wilander leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Del Potro wins: Peak, Statistics
Wilander wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/juan-martin-del-potro-vs-mats-wilander
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Del Potro leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Del Potro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 |
| 🇸🇪 Wilander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 30 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Del PotroRetired | WilanderRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| ATP titles | 22 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 3 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 7 |
| French Open titles | — | 3 |
| Career titles | — | 33 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 20 |
| Davis Cups | — | 3 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 89 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Juan Martín del Potro leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Mats Wilander — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wilander scores higher on dominance, longevity. Del Potro leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Del Potro: 82.4, Wilander: 82.4.
Make your case for Del Potro vs Wilander. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.