Who is better, Del Potro or Renshaw?
Juan Martín del Potro leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for William Renshaw — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Juan Martín del Potro and William Renshaw level at 82.4. Juan Martín del Potro leads on Longevity, Statistics. William Renshaw leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Del Potro wins: Longevity, Statistics
Renshaw wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/juan-martin-del-potro-vs-william-renshaw
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Del Potro leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Del Potro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 |
| 🇬🇧 Renshaw | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 660 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Del PotroRetired | RenshawRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| ATP titles | 22 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 3 | — |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 7 |
| Consecutive Wimbledon titles | — | 6 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 5 |
| Major finals | — | 8 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Juan Martín del Potro leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for William Renshaw — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Renshaw scores higher on dominance, honours. Del Potro leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Del Potro: 82.4, Renshaw: 82.4.
Make your case for Del Potro vs Renshaw. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.