Who is better, Álvarez or Southall?
Julián Álvarez leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Neville Southall — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Julián Álvarez and Neville Southall level at 85.6. Julián Álvarez leads on Honours, Statistics. Neville Southall leads on Longevity, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Álvarez wins: Honours, Statistics
Southall wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/julian-alvarez-v-vs-neville-southall
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Álvarez leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Álvarez | 0 | 0 | 58 | 123 | 364 | 738 |
| 🏴 Southall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 204 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ÁlvarezActive · Atlético Madrid | SouthallRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Premier League titles | 2 | — |
| Copa América titles | 2 | — |
| Career goals | 180 | — |
| League titles | — | 2 |
| FA Cups | — | 2 |
| European Cup Winners' Cups | — | 1 |
| FWA Footballer of the Year | — | 1 |
| Wales caps | — | 92 |
| Dominance w25% | 85 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 91 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Julián Álvarez leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Neville Southall — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Southall scores higher on peak, dominance, longevity. Álvarez leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Álvarez: 85.6, Southall: 85.6.
Make your case for Álvarez vs Southall. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.