GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Foudy vs Angerer

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AngererWinner
89.4

Angerer wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Foudy
89.2

Foudy wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Football

Shareable URL · /compare/julie-foudy-v-vs-nadine-angerer

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Nadine Angerer
89.4

Angerer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. FIFA World Player of the Year in 2013 and unbeaten in the 2007 World Cup.

1. Nadine Angerer
89.4
2. Julie Foudy
89.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Goals per season

Career timeline · Goals per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Goals per season
1. 🇺🇸 Julie Foudy5 seasons played · career day 1,825303 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Nadine Angerer5 seasons played · career day 1,826265 goals
-12.5% vs Foudy at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Foudy0052108303623
🇩🇪 Angerer004594204549

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFoudyRetiredAngererRetired
World Cup titles22
Olympic gold medals2
United States caps274
United States goals45
Olympic medals3
FIFA World Player awards1
European Championship titles6
Germany caps146
World Cup minutes without conceding540
Dominance w25%8684
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%8890
Honours w20%9492
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Angerer89.4
Foudy89.2
The people
Foudy
Angerer

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Foudy vs Angerer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →