Who is better, Foudy or Angerer?
Nadine Angerer leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.2 for Julie Foudy — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nadine Angerer above Julie Foudy: 89.4 vs 89.2. Nadine Angerer leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics. Julie Foudy leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Angerer wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Foudy wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/julie-foudy-v-vs-nadine-angerer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Angerer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Foudy | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 303 | 623 |
| 🇩🇪 Angerer | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 204 | 549 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FoudyRetired | AngererRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | 2 |
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| United States caps | 274 | — |
| United States goals | 45 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| FIFA World Player awards | — | 1 |
| European Championship titles | — | 6 |
| Germany caps | — | 146 |
| World Cup minutes without conceding | — | 540 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Nadine Angerer leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.2 for Julie Foudy — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Foudy scores higher on dominance, honours. Angerer leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Foudy: 89.2, Angerer: 89.4.
Make your case for Foudy vs Angerer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.