AthletesTeams
Chávez vs Barrera
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChávezWinner
89.8Chávez wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Barrera
88.6Barrera wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/julio-cesar-chavez-vs-marco-antonio-barrera
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇽 Julio César Chávez
89.8
Chávez leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Julio César Chávez
2. Marco Antonio Barrera
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇲🇽 Marco Antonio Barrera5 years played · career day 1,825268 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇲🇽 Julio César Chávez5 years played · career day 2,55633 title wins
-87.7% vs Barrera at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Chávez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 41 |
| 🇲🇽 Barrera | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 268 | 561 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChávezRetired | BarreraRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 107 | — |
| Unbeaten run | 87 | — |
| Knockouts | 86 | 44 |
| Title defences | 27 | — |
| Weight divisions | 3 | — |
| World titles in weight classes | — | 3 |
| Professional wins | — | 67 |
| World title fights | — | 26 |
| Professional bouts | — | 75 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Chávez89.8
Barrera88.6
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chávez vs Barrera. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.