Who is better, Chávez or Barrera?
Julio César Chávez leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 88.6 for Marco Antonio Barrera — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Julio César Chávez above Marco Antonio Barrera: 89.8 vs 88.6. Julio César Chávez leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics. Marco Antonio Barrera leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chávez wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Barrera wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/julio-cesar-chavez-vs-marco-antonio-barrera
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chávez leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Chávez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 41 |
| 🇲🇽 Barrera | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 268 | 561 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChávezRetired | BarreraRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 107 | — |
| Unbeaten run | 87 | — |
| Knockouts | 86 | 44 |
| Title defences | 27 | — |
| Weight divisions | 3 | — |
| World titles in weight classes | — | 3 |
| Professional wins | — | 67 |
| World title fights | — | 26 |
| Professional bouts | — | 75 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Julio César Chávez leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 88.6 for Marco Antonio Barrera — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barrera scores higher on peak. Chávez leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chávez: 89.8, Barrera: 88.6.
Make your case for Chávez vs Barrera. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.