Who is better, Jones or Mack?
Julio Jones leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Tom Mack — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jones vs Mack
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Julio Jones and Tom Mack level at 87.6. Julio Jones leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Tom Mack leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JonesWinner
87.6Jones wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Mack
87.6Mack wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/julio-jones-vs-tom-mack
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Julio Jones
87.6
Jones leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Julio Jones
2. Tom Mack
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Julio Jones5 seasons played · career day 1,8256,201 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tom Mack5 seasons played · career day 1,825314 touchdowns
-94.9% vs Jones at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jones | 0 | 0 | 959 | 2,157 | 6,201 | 12,125 |
| 🇺🇸 Mack | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 314 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Jones87.6
Mack87.6
FAQ
Where does Mack beat Jones?
Mack scores higher on longevity. Jones leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Jones vs Mack score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jones: 87.6, Mack: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jones vs Mack. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.