GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mizutani vs Schlager

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MizutaniWinner
84.9

Mizutani wins: Honours, Statistics

Schlager
84.6

Schlager wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/jun-mizutani-vs-werner-schlager

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Jun Mizutani
84.9

Mizutani leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Japan's first Olympic table tennis gold, in mixed doubles at Tokyo 2020.

1. Jun Mizutani
84.9
2. Werner Schlager
84.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Jun Mizutani5 seasons played · career day 3,28665 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇹 Werner Schlager5 seasons played · career day 3,65145 titles
-30.8% vs Mizutani at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Mizutani00002065
🇦🇹 Schlager0000039

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMizutaniRetiredSchlagerRetired
Olympic golds1
Olympic medals3
Japan national titles10
World Tour titles8
Career-high world ranking43
World Championship golds1
European titles2
World Championship medals4
Olympic appearances5
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8686
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mizutani84.9
Schlager84.6
The people
Mizutani
Schlager

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mizutani vs Schlager. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →