Who is better, Buchanan or Clemence?
Kadeisha Buchanan leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Ray Clemence — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kadeisha Buchanan and Ray Clemence level at 87.6. Kadeisha Buchanan leads on Statistics, Peak. Ray Clemence leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Buchanan wins: Peak, Statistics
Clemence wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kadeisha-buchanan-v-vs-ray-clemence
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Buchanan leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Buchanan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 325 | 675 |
| 🏴 Clemence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 270 | 624 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BuchananActive | ClemenceRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 4 | — |
| French league titles | 4 | — |
| Canada caps | 130 | — |
| World Cup Best Young Player awards | 1 | — |
| League titles | — | 5 |
| European Cups | — | 3 |
| UEFA Cups | — | 2 |
| England caps | — | 61 |
| Appearances for Liverpool | — | 665 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Kadeisha Buchanan leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Ray Clemence — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Clemence scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Buchanan leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Buchanan: 87.6, Clemence: 87.6.
Make your case for Buchanan vs Clemence. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.