Who is better, Williamson or Curran?
Kane Williamson leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Sam Curran — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Williamson vs Curran
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kane Williamson and Sam Curran level at 82.4. Kane Williamson leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics. Sam Curran leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WilliamsonWinner
82.4Williamson wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Curran
82.4Curran wins: Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/kane-williamson-vs-sam-curran
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Kane Williamson
82.4
Williamson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Kane Williamson
2. Sam Curran
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Kane Williamson5 years played · career day 1,8253,372 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Sam Curran5 years played · career day 1,825296 runs
-91.2% vs Williamson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Williamson | 0 | 0 | 280 | 760 | 3,372 | 6,438 |
| 🇬🇧 Curran | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 296 | 651 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WilliamsonActive | CurranActive · Rajasthan Royals |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 9,200 | 815 |
| Test centuries | 33 | — |
| Test matches | 105 | — |
| ODI runs | 6,800 | — |
| Test batting average | 54.9 | — |
| Twenty20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Player of the Tournament awards | — | 1 |
| Twenty20 international wickets | — | 60 |
| Test wickets | — | 47 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Williamson82.4
Curran82.4
FAQ
Where does Curran beat Williamson?
Curran scores higher on peak, honours. Williamson leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
How is the Williamson vs Curran score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Williamson: 82.4, Curran: 82.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Williamson vs Curran. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.