Who is better, Williamson or Bresnan?
Tim Bresnan leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.4 for Kane Williamson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tim Bresnan above Kane Williamson: 82.6 vs 82.4. Tim Bresnan leads on Peak, Longevity, Honours. Kane Williamson leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bresnan wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Williamson wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/kane-williamson-vs-tim-bresnan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bresnan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Williamson | 0 | 0 | 280 | 760 | 3,372 | 6,438 |
| 🇬🇧 Bresnan | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WilliamsonActive | BresnanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 9,200 | 575 |
| Test centuries | 33 | — |
| Test matches | 105 | — |
| ODI runs | 6,800 | — |
| Test batting average | 54.9 | — |
| Consecutive Tests won | — | 13 |
| Test wickets | — | 72 |
| Ashes series won | — | 2 |
| First-class wickets | — | 575 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Tim Bresnan leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.4 for Kane Williamson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Williamson scores higher on dominance. Bresnan leads on peak, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Williamson: 82.4, Bresnan: 82.6.
Make your case for Williamson vs Bresnan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.