Who is better, Kareem or Carril?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 85.1 for Pete Carril — a gap of 10.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kareem Abdul-Jabbar above Pete Carril: 95.2 vs 85.1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kareem wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Carril wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/kareem-vs-pete-carril
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kareem leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Carril — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kareem | 0 | 0 | 28.8 | 60.5 | 152.5 | 262.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Carril | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 66 | 142 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KareemRetired | CarrilRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| MVP awards | 6 | — |
| All-Star selections | 19 | — |
| Career points | 38,387 | — |
| Finals MVP | 2 | — |
| Career rebounds | 17,440 | — |
| Ivy League titles | — | 13 |
| College coaching wins | — | 525 |
| NIT championships | — | 1 |
| Seasons at Princeton | — | 29 |
| NCAA tournament appearances | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 95 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 88 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 85.1 for Pete Carril — a gap of 10.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carril does not lead any of the five categories; Kareem is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kareem: 95.2, Carril: 85.1.
Make your case for Kareem vs Carril. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.