Who is better, Kareem or Allen?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 90.7 for Phog Allen — a gap of 4.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kareem Abdul-Jabbar above Phog Allen: 95.2 vs 90.7. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kareem wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Allen wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/kareem-vs-phog-allen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kareem leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Allen — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kareem | 0 | 0 | 28.8 | 60.5 | 152.5 | 262.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Allen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 105 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KareemRetired | AllenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| MVP awards | 6 | — |
| All-Star selections | 19 | — |
| Career points | 38,387 | — |
| Finals MVP | 2 | — |
| Career rebounds | 17,440 | — |
| College coaching wins | — | 746 |
| NCAA championships | — | 1 |
| Conference titles | — | 24 |
| Seasons as a head coach | — | 48 |
| Olympic gold as assistant coach | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 95 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 90 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 90.7 for Phog Allen — a gap of 4.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Allen does not lead any of the five categories; Kareem is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kareem: 95.2, Allen: 90.7.
Make your case for Kareem vs Allen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.