Who is better, Kareem or Finney-Smith?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 17.1 for Dorian Finney-Smith — a gap of 78.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kareem Abdul-Jabbar above Dorian Finney-Smith: 95.2 vs 17.1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kareem wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Finney-Smith wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/kareem-vs-ros-dorian-finney-smith
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kareem leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Finney-Smith — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kareem | 0 | 0 | 28.8 | 60.5 | 152.5 | 262.6 |
| 🏳️ Finney-Smith | 0 | 0 | 348 | 472 | 2,342 | 5,995 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KareemRetired | Finney-SmithActive · Atlanta Hawks |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| MVP awards | 6 | — |
| All-Star selections | 19 | — |
| Career points | 38,387 | — |
| Finals MVP | 2 | — |
| Career rebounds | 17,440 | — |
| NBA games | — | 757 |
| NBA points | — | 6,117 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 17.1 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 21.9 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 15.1 |
| Honours w20% | 95 | 13.1 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 18.7 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 17.1 for Dorian Finney-Smith — a gap of 78.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Finney-Smith does not lead any of the five categories; Kareem is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kareem: 95.2, Finney-Smith: 17.1.
Make your case for Kareem vs Finney-Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.