Who is better, Kareem or Niederhäuser?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 16.5 for Yanic Konan Niederhäuser — a gap of 78.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kareem Abdul-Jabbar above Yanic Konan Niederhäuser: 95.2 vs 16.5. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kareem wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Niederhäuser wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/kareem-vs-ros-yanic-konan-niederhauser
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kareem leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Niederhäuser — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kareem | 0 | 0 | 28.8 | 60.5 | 152.5 | 262.6 |
| 🏳️ Niederhäuser | 0 | 0 | 176 | 176 | 176 | 176 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KareemRetired | NiederhäuserActive · Los Angeles Clippers |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 6 | — |
| MVP awards | 6 | — |
| All-Star selections | 19 | — |
| Career points | 38,387 | — |
| Finals MVP | 2 | — |
| Career rebounds | 17,440 | — |
| NBA games | — | 41 |
| NBA points | — | 176 |
| Number | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 16.4 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 21.3 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 14.4 |
| Honours w20% | 95 | 12.4 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 18.3 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 16.5 for Yanic Konan Niederhäuser — a gap of 78.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Niederhäuser does not lead any of the five categories; Kareem is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kareem: 95.2, Niederhäuser: 16.5.
Make your case for Kareem vs Niederhäuser. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.