Who is better, Rolton or Fitzpatrick?
Karen Rolton leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.5 for Cathryn Fitzpatrick — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Rolton wins: Peak, Statistics
Fitzpatrick wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/karen-rolton-vs-cathryn-fitzpatrick
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rolton leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Rolton | 0 | 0 | 30 | 68 | 218 | 462 |
| 🇦🇺 Fitzpatrick | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 74 | 151 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RoltonRetired | FitzpatrickRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | 2 |
| ODI runs | 4,814 | — |
| ODI average | 48.14 | — |
| Highest Test score | 209 | — |
| ODI wickets | 84 | 180 |
| ODI bowling average | — | 16.79 |
| Test wickets | — | 60 |
| ODI matches | — | 109 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Karen Rolton leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.5 for Cathryn Fitzpatrick — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fitzpatrick scores higher on longevity. Rolton leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rolton: 90.8, Fitzpatrick: 90.5.
Make your case for Rolton vs Fitzpatrick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.