Who is better, Rolton or Shakib?
Karen Rolton leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.8 for Shakib Al Hasan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Rolton vs Shakib
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Karen Rolton and Shakib Al Hasan level at 90.8. Karen Rolton leads on Honours. Shakib Al Hasan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RoltonWinner
90.8Rolton wins: Honours
Shakib
90.8Shakib wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/karen-rolton-vs-shakib-al-hasan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Karen Rolton
90.8
Rolton leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Karen Rolton
2. Shakib Al Hasan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇩 Shakib Al Hasan5 years played · career day 1,825228 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Karen Rolton5 years played · career day 1,825218 runs
-4.4% vs Shakib at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Rolton | 0 | 0 | 30 | 68 | 218 | 462 |
| 🇧🇩 Shakib | 0 | 0 | 30 | 68 | 228 | 504 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Rolton90.8
Shakib90.8
FAQ
Where does Shakib beat Rolton?
Shakib scores higher on longevity. Rolton leads on honours.
How is the Rolton vs Shakib score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rolton: 90.8, Shakib: 90.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Rolton vs Shakib. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.