Who is better, Rolton or Warne?
Karen Rolton leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.7 for Shane Warne — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Rolton vs Warne
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Karen Rolton above Shane Warne: 90.8 vs 90.7. Karen Rolton leads on Peak, Statistics, Honours. Shane Warne leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RoltonWinner
90.8Rolton wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Warne
90.7Warne wins: Dominance, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/karen-rolton-vs-shane-warne
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Karen Rolton
90.8
Rolton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Karen Rolton
2. Shane Warne
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Shane Warne5 years played · career day 2,556275 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Karen Rolton5 years played · career day 1,825218 runs
-20.7% vs Warne at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Rolton | 0 | 0 | 30 | 68 | 218 | 462 |
| 🇦🇺 Warne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 169 | 373 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Rolton90.8
Warne90.7
FAQ
Where does Warne beat Rolton?
Warne scores higher on dominance, longevity. Rolton leads on peak, honours, statistics.
How is the Rolton vs Warne score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rolton: 90.8, Warne: 90.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Rolton vs Warne. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.