Who is better, Brienesse or Haughey?
Siobhán Haughey leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.3 for Karin Brienesse — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Siobhán Haughey above Karin Brienesse: 83.4 vs 83.3. Siobhán Haughey leads on Dominance, Peak. Karin Brienesse leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Haughey wins: Dominance, Peak
Brienesse wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/karin-brienesse-vs-siobhan-haughey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Haughey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Brienesse | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 338 | 655 |
| 🇭🇰 Haughey | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrienesseRetired | HaugheyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| Dutch titles | 12 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic bronze medals | — | 2 |
| Short-course world titles | — | 4 |
| Short-course world records | — | 2 |
| Asian records | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Siobhán Haughey leads with a GOAT score of 83.4 against 83.3 for Karin Brienesse — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brienesse scores higher on honours, longevity. Haughey leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brienesse: 83.3, Haughey: 83.4.
Make your case for Brienesse vs Haughey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.