Who is better, Towns or Aldridge?
Karl-Anthony Towns leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for LaMarcus Aldridge — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Karl-Anthony Towns and LaMarcus Aldridge level at 81.2. Karl-Anthony Towns leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. LaMarcus Aldridge leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Towns wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Aldridge wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/karl-anthony-towns-vs-lamarcus-aldridge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Towns leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Towns | 0 | 0 | 18.3 | 43.4 | 115.6 | 207.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Aldridge | 0 | 0 | 9 | 26.8 | 84.6 | 174 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TownsActive · New York Knicks | AldridgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 5 | 7 |
| Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Three-point contest wins | 1 | — |
| Points per game peak | 25.1 | 23.4 |
| All-NBA teams | — | 5 |
| Career points | — | 20,558 |
| Career rebounds | — | 8,478 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Karl-Anthony Towns leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for LaMarcus Aldridge — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Aldridge scores higher on longevity. Towns leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Towns: 81.2, Aldridge: 81.2.
Make your case for Towns vs Aldridge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.