Who is better, Towns or Moncrief?
Karl-Anthony Towns leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Sidney Moncrief — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Karl-Anthony Towns and Sidney Moncrief level at 81.2. Karl-Anthony Towns leads on Statistics, Longevity. Sidney Moncrief leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Towns wins: Longevity, Statistics
Moncrief wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/karl-anthony-towns-vs-sidney-moncrief
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Towns leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Towns | 0 | 0 | 18.3 | 43.4 | 115.6 | 207.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Moncrief | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TownsActive · New York Knicks | MoncriefRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 5 | 5 |
| Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Three-point contest wins | 1 | — |
| Points per game peak | 25.1 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| All-Defensive selections | — | 5 |
| Career points | — | 11,931 |
| Seasons played | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Karl-Anthony Towns leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Sidney Moncrief — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Moncrief scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Towns leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Towns: 81.2, Moncrief: 81.2.
Make your case for Towns vs Moncrief. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.