Who is better, Plíšková or McLoughlin?
Karolína Plíšková leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Maurice McLoughlin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Karolína Plíšková and Maurice McLoughlin level at 80.3. Karolína Plíšková leads on Longevity, Statistics. Maurice McLoughlin leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Plíšková wins: Longevity, Statistics
McLoughlin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/karolina-pliskova-vs-maurice-mcloughlin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Plíšková leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Plíšková | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 |
| 🇺🇸 McLoughlin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PlíškováActive | McLoughlinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks at No. 1 | 8 | — |
| WTA titles | 17 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 2 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 3 | — |
| Career aces | 3,500 | — |
| US Championships titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 2 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 1 |
| World No. 1 rankings | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Karolína Plíšková leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Maurice McLoughlin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McLoughlin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Plíšková leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Plíšková: 80.3, McLoughlin: 80.3.
Make your case for Plíšková vs McLoughlin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.