Who is better, Plíšková or Sears?
Richard Sears leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Karolína Plíšková — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Richard Sears above Karolína Plíšková: 80.4 vs 80.3. Richard Sears leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Karolína Plíšková leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sears wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Plíšková wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/karolina-pliskova-vs-richard-sears
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sears leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Plíšková | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 |
| 🇺🇸 Sears | 0 | 0 | 70 | 149 | 419 | 568 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PlíškováActive | SearsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks at No. 1 | 8 | — |
| WTA titles | 17 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 2 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 3 | — |
| Career aces | 3,500 | — |
| US Championships titles | — | 7 |
| US doubles titles | — | 6 |
| Consecutive national titles | — | 7 |
| Singles finals lost | — | 0 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 55 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 78 |
Richard Sears leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Karolína Plíšková — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Plíšková scores higher on statistics, longevity. Sears leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Plíšková: 80.3, Sears: 80.4.
Make your case for Plíšková vs Sears. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.