Who is better, Mrázová or Green?
Katarína Mrázová leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.3 for Shorty Green — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Katarína Mrázová and Shorty Green level at 77.3. Katarína Mrázová leads on Longevity, Statistics. Shorty Green leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mrázová wins: Longevity, Statistics
Green wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/katarina-mrazova-vs-shorty-green
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mrázová leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇰 Mrázová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 36 | 144 |
| 🇨🇦 Green | 0 | 0 | 60 | 150 | 330 | 330 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MrázováActive | GreenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 10 | — |
| Slovakia caps | 130 | — |
| European Women's Champions Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career club points | 300 | — |
| NHL seasons | — | 4 |
| Career goals | — | 33 |
| Games played | — | 103 |
| Allan Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career points | — | 41 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Katarína Mrázová leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.3 for Shorty Green — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Green scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Mrázová leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mrázová: 77.3, Green: 77.3.
Make your case for Mrázová vs Green. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.