Who is better, Baďurová or Adeoye?
Kateřina Baďurová leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Margaret Adeoye — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kateřina Baďurová above Margaret Adeoye: 78.6 vs 78.3. Kateřina Baďurová leads on Peak, Statistics. Margaret Adeoye leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baďurová wins: Peak, Statistics
Adeoye wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kateřina-badurova-vs-margaret-adeoye
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baďurová leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Baďurová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.5 | 31.3 |
| 🇬🇧 Adeoye | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 607 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaďurováRetired | AdeoyeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Pole vault best | 4.75 | — |
| National titles | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games | 2 | — |
| National records | 1 | — |
| European gold medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| British titles | — | 2 |
| Personal best 200 m (s) | — | 22.85 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Kateřina Baďurová leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Margaret Adeoye — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adeoye scores higher on honours, longevity. Baďurová leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baďurová: 78.6, Adeoye: 78.3.
Make your case for Baďurová vs Adeoye. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.