Who is better, Sciver-Brunt or Barnes?
Katherine Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 90.3 for Sydney Barnes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sciver-Brunt vs Barnes
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katherine Sciver-Brunt above Sydney Barnes: 90.4 vs 90.3. Katherine Sciver-Brunt leads on Longevity, Honours. Sydney Barnes leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
90.4Sciver-Brunt wins: Longevity, Honours
Barnes
90.3Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/katherine-sciver-brunt-vs-sydney-barnes
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Katherine Sciver-Brunt
90.4
Sciver-Brunt leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Katherine Sciver-Brunt
2. Sydney Barnes
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Sydney Barnes5 years played · career day 4,381100 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Katherine Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,82690 runs
-10.0% vs Barnes at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 64 | 222 |
| 🏴 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Sciver-BruntRetired | BarnesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| ODI wickets | 170 | — |
| T20I wickets | 114 | — |
| Test wickets | 51 | 189 |
| Test bowling average | — | 16.43 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 24 |
| Tests played | — | 27 |
| Best innings figures | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt90.4
Barnes90.3
FAQ
Where does Barnes beat Sciver-Brunt?
Barnes scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Sciver-Brunt leads on honours, longevity.
How is the Sciver-Brunt vs Barnes score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sciver-Brunt: 90.4, Barnes: 90.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Barnes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.