GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sciver-Brunt vs Richards

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
90.4

Sciver-Brunt wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Richards
90.2

Richards wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/katherine-sciver-brunt-vs-viv-richards

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Katherine Sciver-Brunt
90.4

Sciver-Brunt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. England's leading women's wicket-taker and a two-time World Cup winner.

1. Katherine Sciver-Brunt
90.4
2. Viv Richards
90.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴 Viv Richards5 years played · career day 3,286316 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Katherine Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,82690 runs
-71.5% vs Richards at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt00102464222
🏴 Richards000055316

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSciver-BruntRetiredRichardsRetired
World Cup titles2
T20 World Cup titles1
ODI wickets170
T20I wickets114
Test wickets51
Test runs8,540
Test centuries24
World Cups2
Test average50.23
ODI runs6,721
Wisden Cricketer of the Century1
Dominance w25%8690
Peak w20%9493
Longevity w20%9288
Honours w20%8890
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt90.4
Richards90.2
The people
Sciver-Brunt
Richards

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sciver-Brunt vs Richards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →