AthletesTeams
Taylor vs Dempsey
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TaylorWinner
87.2Taylor wins: Longevity, Honours
Dempsey
86.8Dempsey wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/katie-taylor-vs-nonpareil-jack-dempsey
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇪 Katie Taylor
87.2
Taylor leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Katie Taylor
2. Nonpareil Jack Dempsey
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇪 Nonpareil Jack Dempsey5 years played · career day 2,19142 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇪 Katie Taylor5 years played · career day 7,30415 title wins
-64.3% vs Dempsey at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇪 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇮🇪 Dempsey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 | 57 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TaylorActive | DempseyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Undisputed reigns | 2 | — |
| World amateur titles | 5 | — |
| World titles | 8 | — |
| Career wins | 25 | — |
| European amateur titles | 6 | — |
| World titles won | — | 1 |
| Professional wins | — | 50 |
| Knockout wins | — | 25 |
| World title defences | — | 5 |
| Professional bouts | — | 68 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Taylor87.2
Dempsey86.8
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Taylor vs Dempsey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.