Who is better, Taylor or Dempsey?
Katie Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 86.8 for Nonpareil Jack Dempsey — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katie Taylor above Nonpareil Jack Dempsey: 87.2 vs 86.8. Katie Taylor leads on Longevity, Honours. Nonpareil Jack Dempsey leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Taylor wins: Longevity, Honours
Dempsey wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/katie-taylor-vs-nonpareil-jack-dempsey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Taylor leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇪 Taylor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇮🇪 Dempsey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 | 57 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TaylorActive | DempseyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Undisputed reigns | 2 | — |
| World amateur titles | 5 | — |
| World titles | 8 | — |
| Career wins | 25 | — |
| European amateur titles | 6 | — |
| World titles won | — | 1 |
| Professional wins | — | 50 |
| Knockout wins | — | 25 |
| World title defences | — | 5 |
| Professional bouts | — | 68 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Katie Taylor leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 86.8 for Nonpareil Jack Dempsey — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dempsey scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Taylor leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Taylor: 87.2, Dempsey: 86.8.
Make your case for Taylor vs Dempsey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.