Who is better, Nekoda or Wlazły?
Mariusz Wlazły leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Katsutoshi Nekoda — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mariusz Wlazły above Katsutoshi Nekoda: 87.0 vs 86.8. Mariusz Wlazły leads on Longevity, Statistics. Katsutoshi Nekoda leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wlazły wins: Longevity, Statistics
Nekoda wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/katsutoshi-nekoda-vs-mariusz-wlazly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wlazły leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Nekoda | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
| 🇵🇱 Wlazły | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NekodaRetired | WlazłyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Japan caps | 300 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Polish league titles | — | 8 |
| PlusLiga career points | — | 8,000 |
| Polish MVP awards | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Mariusz Wlazły leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Katsutoshi Nekoda — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Nekoda scores higher on dominance, honours. Wlazły leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nekoda: 86.8, Wlazły: 87.0.
Make your case for Nekoda vs Wlazły. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.