Who is better, McKeown or Bohus?
Richárd Bohus leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.5 for Kaylee McKeown — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Richárd Bohus above Kaylee McKeown: 79.6 vs 79.5. Richárd Bohus leads on Longevity. Kaylee McKeown leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bohus wins: Longevity
McKeown wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/kaylee-mckeown-vs-richard-bohus
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bohus leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 McKeown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59.2 | 232.7 | 462.53 |
| 🇭🇺 Bohus | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 292 | 630 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McKeownActive | BohusRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 5 | — |
| World titles | 4 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 7 | — |
| Personal best 100 m back (s) | 57.33 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Short-course world medals | — | 1 |
| Hungarian titles | — | 10 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| National records set | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 56 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Richárd Bohus leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.5 for Kaylee McKeown — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McKeown scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Bohus leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McKeown: 79.5, Bohus: 79.6.
Make your case for McKeown vs Bohus. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.