Who is better, Balcha or Bailey-Cole?
Ristananna Bailey-Cole leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.5 for Kebede Balcha — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ristananna Bailey-Cole above Kebede Balcha: 76.6 vs 76.5. Ristananna Bailey-Cole leads on Statistics. Kebede Balcha leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bailey-Cole wins: Statistics
Balcha wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/kebede-balcha-vs-ristananna-bailey-cole
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bailey-Cole leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Balcha | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 265 | 707 |
| 🇯🇲 Bailey-Cole | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BalchaRetired | Bailey-ColeActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Montreal Marathon wins | 3 | — |
| Marathon personal best | 2.086 | — |
| Marathon victories | 6 | — |
| Years at the top level | 14 | — |
| NACAC medals | — | 1 |
| Jamaican championship medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 2 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 54.9 |
| NCAA All-America honours | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 82 |
Ristananna Bailey-Cole leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.5 for Kebede Balcha — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Balcha scores higher on peak, longevity. Bailey-Cole leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Balcha: 76.5, Bailey-Cole: 76.6.
Make your case for Balcha vs Bailey-Cole. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.