Who is better, Boyce or Adcock?
Neil Adcock leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Keith Boyce — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Boyce vs Adcock
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Neil Adcock above Keith Boyce: 83.2 vs 83.1. Neil Adcock leads on Dominance, Statistics. Keith Boyce leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AdcockWinner
83.2Adcock wins: Dominance, Statistics
Boyce
83.1Boyce wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/keith-boyce-vs-neil-adcock
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Neil Adcock
83.2
Adcock leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Neil Adcock
2. Keith Boyce
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇿🇦 Neil Adcock5 years played · career day 1,826296 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇧 Keith Boyce5 years played · career day 1,825279 runs
-5.7% vs Adcock at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇧 Boyce | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 279 | 601 |
| 🇿🇦 Adcock | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 222 | 640 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Adcock83.2
Boyce83.1
FAQ
Where does Boyce beat Adcock?
Boyce scores higher on honours. Adcock leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Boyce vs Adcock score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boyce: 83.1, Adcock: 83.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Boyce vs Adcock. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.