Who is better, Barrington or Azharuddin?
Ken Barrington leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Mohammad Azharuddin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ken Barrington above Mohammad Azharuddin: 85.6 vs 85.5. Ken Barrington leads on Dominance, Statistics. Mohammad Azharuddin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barrington wins: Dominance, Statistics
Azharuddin wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ken-barrington-vs-mohammad-azharuddin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barrington leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Barrington | 0 | 0 | 40 | 87 | 271 | 617 |
| 🇮🇳 Azharuddin | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 214 | 609 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BarringtonRetired | AzharuddinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 6,806 | 6,215 |
| Batting average | 59 | — |
| Test centuries | 20 | 22 |
| Tests played | 82 | 99 |
| First-class centuries | 76 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 9,378 |
| Tests as captain | — | 47 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteKen Barrington leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Mohammad Azharuddin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Azharuddin scores higher on longevity. Barrington leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barrington: 85.6, Azharuddin: 85.5.
Make your case for Barrington vs Azharuddin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.