Who is better, Norton or St. John?
Ken Norton leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Mia St. John — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ken Norton and Mia St. John level at 82.2. Ken Norton leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Mia St. John leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Norton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
St. John wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ken-norton-vs-mia-st-john
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Norton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Norton | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 23 | 34 |
| 🇺🇸 St. John | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 285 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Ken Norton leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Mia St. John — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
St. John scores higher on statistics, longevity. Norton leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Norton: 82.2, St. John: 82.2.
Make your case for Norton vs St. John. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.