Who is better, McHale or Ćosić?
Kevin McHale leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Krešimir Ćosić — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kevin McHale and Krešimir Ćosić level at 87.5. Kevin McHale leads on Dominance, Statistics. Krešimir Ćosić leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McHale wins: Dominance, Statistics
Ćosić wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kevin-mchale-vs-kresimir-cosic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McHale leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McHale | 0 | 0 | 10 | 23.6 | 56.1 | 168.4 |
| 🇭🇷 Ćosić | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 256 | 693 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McHaleRetired | ĆosićRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA championships | 3 | — |
| NBA All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| All-Defensive selections | 6 | — |
| Sixth Man of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| Career points | 17,335 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 3 |
| European Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Kevin McHale leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Krešimir Ćosić — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ćosić scores higher on honours, longevity. McHale leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McHale: 87.5, Ćosić: 87.5.
Make your case for McHale vs Ćosić. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.