GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Pietersen vs Mooney

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PietersenWinner
88.4

Pietersen wins: Peak, Longevity

Mooney
88.4

Mooney wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/kevin-pietersen-vs-beth-mooney

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Kevin Pietersen
88.4

Pietersen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. England's 2005 Ashes hero and a T20 World Cup-winning player of the tournament.

1. Kevin Pietersen
88.4
2. Beth Mooney
88.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Kevin Pietersen5 years played · career day 3,286248 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Beth Mooney5 years played · career day 1,826222 runs
-10.5% vs Pietersen at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Pietersen000056248
🇦🇺 Mooney003068164420

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricPietersenRetiredMooneyActive
Test runs8,181
Test centuries23
T20 World Cup titles13
Ashes series won3
Test average47.28
World Cup titles1
T20I runs3,000
ODI average52
Player of the tournament awards1
Dominance w25%8686
Peak w20%9694
Longevity w20%8278
Honours w20%8692
Statistics w15%9494

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Pietersen88.4
Mooney88.4
The people
Pietersen
Mooney

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Pietersen vs Mooney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →