Who is better, Khan or Mata?
Khan leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Khan vs Mata
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Khan above Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong: 84.8 vs 84.7. Khan leads on Dominance, Honours. Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KhanWinner
84.8Khan wins: Dominance, Honours
Mata
84.7Mata wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/khan-lol-vs-mata-lol
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Khan
84.8
Khan leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Khan
2. Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇰🇷 Cho "Mata" Se-hyeong5 split years played · career day 1,826390 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 Khan5 split years played · career day 1,825371 trophies
-4.9% vs Mata at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Khan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 371 | 584 |
| 🇰🇷 Mata | 0 | 0 | 58 | 130 | 310 | 660 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Khan84.8
Mata84.7
FAQ
Where does Mata beat Khan?
Mata scores higher on peak. Khan leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Khan vs Mata score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Khan: 84.8, Mata: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Khan vs Mata. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.