Who is better, Hamraoui or Yankey?
Kheira Hamraoui leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 84.0 for Rachel Yankey — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hamraoui vs Yankey
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kheira Hamraoui and Rachel Yankey level at 84.0. Kheira Hamraoui leads on Honours. Rachel Yankey leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HamraouiWinner
84.0Hamraoui wins: Honours
Yankey
84.0Yankey wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/kheira-hamraoui-v-vs-rachel-yankey-v
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇷 Kheira Hamraoui
84.0
Hamraoui leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Kheira Hamraoui
2. Rachel Yankey
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Rachel Yankey5 seasons played · career day 1,826290 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Kheira Hamraoui5 seasons played · career day 1,825287 goals
-1.0% vs Yankey at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Hamraoui | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 287 | 584 |
| 🏴 Yankey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 224 | 598 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hamraoui84.0
Yankey84.0
FAQ
Where does Yankey beat Hamraoui?
Yankey scores higher on longevity. Hamraoui leads on honours.
How is the Hamraoui vs Yankey score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hamraoui: 84.0, Yankey: 84.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hamraoui vs Yankey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.