Who is better, Busch or Bacon?
Phoebe Bacon leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Kim Busch — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Phoebe Bacon above Kim Busch: 76.9 vs 76.8. Phoebe Bacon leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Kim Busch leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bacon wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Busch wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/kim-busch-vs-phoebe-bacon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bacon leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Busch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 29 |
| 🇺🇸 Bacon | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Phoebe Bacon leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Kim Busch — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Busch scores higher on longevity. Bacon leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Busch: 76.8, Bacon: 76.9.
Make your case for Busch vs Bacon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.