Who is better, Källström or Schillaci?
Kim Källström leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Salvatore Schillaci — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kim Källström and Salvatore Schillaci level at 83.1. Kim Källström leads on Longevity, Statistics. Salvatore Schillaci leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Källström wins: Longevity, Statistics
Schillaci wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kim-kallstrom-v-vs-salvatore-schillaci-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Källström leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Källström | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 618 |
| 🇮🇹 Schillaci | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 307 | 653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KällströmRetired | SchillaciRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 131 | — |
| Ligue 1 titles | 4 | — |
| Sweden goals | 16 | — |
| French cup titles | 2 | — |
| Career appearances | 600 | — |
| World Cup Golden Boot awards | — | 1 |
| World Cup Golden Ball awards | — | 1 |
| UEFA Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Italy goals | — | 7 |
| Career goals | — | 140 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 87 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Kim Källström leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Salvatore Schillaci — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schillaci scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Källström leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Källström: 83.1, Schillaci: 83.1.
Make your case for Källström vs Schillaci. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.