Who is better, Hill or Blangé?
Kimberly Hill leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.2 for Peter Blangé — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kimberly Hill above Peter Blangé: 81.5 vs 81.2. Kimberly Hill leads on Honours, Statistics. Peter Blangé leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hill wins: Honours, Statistics
Blangé wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/kimberly-hill-vs-peter-blange
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hill leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 280 | 732 |
| 🇳🇱 Blangé | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 252 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HillActive | BlangéRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World League titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Years with the national team | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Kimberly Hill leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.2 for Peter Blangé — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Blangé scores higher on longevity. Hill leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hill: 81.5, Blangé: 81.2.
Make your case for Hill vs Blangé. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.