Who is better, Antonelli or Pérez?
Andrea Kimi Antonelli leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.6 for Sergio Pérez — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrea Kimi Antonelli above Sergio Pérez: 76.8 vs 76.6. Andrea Kimi Antonelli leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Sergio Pérez leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Antonelli wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Pérez wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/kimi-antonelli-vs-sergio-perez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Antonelli leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Antonelli | 0 | 0 | 55 | 122 | 383 | 468 |
| 🇲🇽 Pérez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AntonelliActive | PérezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Formula Regional titles | 2 | — |
| Formula One podiums | 2 | — |
| Fastest laps | 1 | — |
| Youngest pole position age | 18 | — |
| Grand prix starts | 45 | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 6 |
| Podiums | — | 39 |
| Pole positions | — | 3 |
| Best championship finish | — | 2 |
| Grand Prix starts | — | 281 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Andrea Kimi Antonelli leads with a GOAT score of 76.8 against 76.6 for Sergio Pérez — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pérez scores higher on longevity. Antonelli leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Antonelli: 76.8, Pérez: 76.6.
Make your case for Antonelli vs Pérez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.