Who is better, Keino or Noguchi?
Mizuki Noguchi leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.8 for Kipchoge Keino — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mizuki Noguchi above Kipchoge Keino: 85.0 vs 84.8. Mizuki Noguchi leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics. Kipchoge Keino leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Noguchi wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Keino wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kipchoge-keino-vs-mizuki-noguchi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Noguchi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Keino | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 21 |
| 🇯🇵 Noguchi | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 316 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KeinoRetired | NoguchiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 2 | — |
| 1500m best (sec) | 214.9 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Marathon personal best in seconds | — | 7,740 |
| Major marathon wins | — | 3 |
| Asian records set | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Mizuki Noguchi leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.8 for Kipchoge Keino — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keino scores higher on dominance, honours. Noguchi leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Keino: 84.8, Noguchi: 85.0.
Make your case for Keino vs Noguchi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.